Speaking about Fauci, here is a presentation that reveals the tremendous crimes he has committed, and explains how long he has been in power in the US Government, as well as the gigantic sums of money that he has had at his disposal which he used to fund criminal enterprises. All the presidents, and everyone around Fauci, knew this. Why did no one stop him and put him in jail?
In what some have suggested is politicized timing, the World Health Organization on Wednesday changed the protocol for COVID-19 tests, which will result in large reductions in the numbers of positive cases — which will then be held up as “proof” that the highly publicized vaccines have helped end the “pandemic”:
The body took this action just one hour after Joe Biden was sworn in as president of the United States.
On Wednesday, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidance regarding the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, which is being widely used across the globe in order to detect cases of COVID-19. In a short information notice, the WHO referred back to an instruction booklet for COVID testing, released in September 2020, noting that “careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed.”
The guidance warned against diagnosing someone as having the virus just because he tests positive if he does not present with symptoms of COVID-19.
It also warned about the high risk of false positives: “The cycle threshold (Ct – the number of magnifications of samples) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.”
“As disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases. The probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity,” the WHO continued.
[In other words, the PCR protocol that was being used to produce “evidence” of growing numbers of COVID is now being changed. Now the number of cycles (how many times the magnification factor is doubled) is being reduced in order to indicate fewer cases.]
We’ve been predicting for the last 8 months that this is exactly what they would do in order to “end the pandemic” — change the cycling threshold for the PCR test, which would automatically eliminate all the false positives.
And that’s why they chose the PCR “test” from the very beginning — because it is not really a diagnostic “test” at all, but a laboratory method for studying small fragments of DNA – which, given sufficient numbers of cycles/magnifications can find “evidence” of corona virus anywhere and in anyone.
Now that it’s done what it was supposed to do — create the illusion of a pandemic — the PCR can be demoted from the “gold standard” of COVID tests to a mere “diagnostic aid” that should be confirmed when the patient presents actual physical symptoms.
By making these new recommendations, the WHO is essentially signaling that the first phase of “pandemic” is over — and we will now see more and more stories of infection rates slowly declining, as Israel has begun doing — as more and more people are vaccinated with the worthless and dangerous “vaccines”.
But remember — Anthony Fauci himself proclaimed that these COVID vaccines won’t stop you from “contracting” the virus — it will only help lessen the severity of the “disease” if you become symptomatic.
In that sense, we should see no decline in “infection” rates — or case numbers — in the wake of the vaccine roll out.
But we will see a decline in case numbers because of these new WHO’s recommendations for changes in the PCR test standards — which will be used to “prove” the vaccines now magically do “block” new infections.
But we will all still have to wear useless masks and social distance because — well — just because.
Mired in financial collapse, moral decay, and lack of leadership & direction, the last sole superpower is lashing out in every direction, spreading brutal destruction throughout the world for nothing more than its own depraved sake.
The story is the same every time: some nation, due to a confluence of lucky circumstances, becomes powerful — much more powerful than the rest — and, for a time, is dominant. But the lucky circumstances, which often amount to no more than a few advantageous quirks of geology, be it Welsh coal or West Texas oil, in due course come to an end. In the meantime, the erstwhile superpower becomes corrupted by its own power.
As the endgame approaches, those still nominally in charge of the collapsing empire resort to all sorts of desperate measures — all except one: they will refuse to ever consider the fact that they have fouled their own nest. George Orwell once offered an excellent explanation for this phenomenon: as the imperial end-game approaches, it becomes a matter of imperial self-preservation to breed a special-purpose ruling class — one that is incapable of understanding that the end-game is approaching. So they arrogantly keep the game going for as long as possible.
The approaching imperial collapse can be seen in the ever-worsening results the empire gets for its imperial efforts. After World War II, the U.S. was able to polish its image by helping to “rebuild” Germany, along with the rest of Western Europe. Japan also was “rebuilt” under U.S. tutelage, as was South Korea after the end of fighting on the Korean peninsula. With Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, all of which were badly damaged by the U.S., the results were significantly worse: Vietnam war was lost, Cambodia saw a period of genocide, while amazingly resilient Laos — the most heavily bombed country on the planet — recovered on its own.
The first Gulf War went even more badly: fearful of undertaking a ground offensive in Iraq, the U.S. stopped short of its regular practice of toppling the government and installing a puppet regime there and left it in limbo for a decade. When the U.S. did eventually invade, it succeeded — after killing countless civilians and destroying much of the infrastructure leaving behind a dismembered corpse of a country.
Similar results have been achieved in other places where the U.S. saw fit to get involved: Somalia, Libya and, most recently, Yemen. Let’s not even mention Afghanistan, since all empires have failed to achieve good results there. So the trend is unmistakable: whereas at its height the empire destroyed in order to rebuild the world in its own image, but as the empire nears its end it destroys simply for the sake of destruction, leaving piles of corpses and smoldering ruins in its wake.
Another unmistakable trend has to do with the efficacy of spending money on “defense” (which, in the case of the U.S., should be redefined as “offense”). Having a lavishly endowed military can sometimes lead to success, but here too something has shifted over time. Instead of “success” it is more correctly “excess.” The famous American can-do spirit that was evident to all during World War II, when the U.S. dwarfed the rest of the world with its industrial might, is no more. Now, more and more, military spending itself is the goal — never mind what it achieves.
And what it achieves is the latest F-35 jet fighter that can’t fly; the latest aircraft carrier that can’t launch planes without destroying them if they are fitted with the auxiliary tanks they need to fly combat missions; the most technologically advanced AEGIS destroyer that can be taken out of commission by a single unarmed Russian jet carrying a basket of electronic warfare equipment; and another aircraft carrier that can be frightened out of deep water and forced to anchor by a few Russian submarines out on routine patrol.
But the Americans like their weapons, and they like handing them out as a show of support. But more often than not these weapons end up in other hands: the ones they gave to Iraq are now in the hands of ISIS; the ones they gave to the Ukrainian nationalists have been sold to the Syrian government; the ones they gave to the government in Yemen is now in the hands of the Houthis who recently overthrew it. And so the efficacy of lavish military spending has dwindled too.
With the strategy of “destroying in order to create” no longer viable, but with the blind ambition to still try to prevail everywhere in the world somehow still part of the political culture, all that remains is murder. The main tool of foreign policy becomes political assassination: be it Saddam Hussein, or Muammar Qaddafi, or Slobodan Milošević, or Osama bin Laden, or any number of lesser targets, the idea is to simply kill them.
While aiming for the head of an organization is a favorite technique, the general populace gets its share of murder too. How many funerals and wedding parties have been taken out by drone strikes? I don’t know that anyone in the U.S. really knows, but I am sure that those whose relatives were killed do remember, and will remember for the next few centuries at least.
(Here are some “brave” US soldiers in Iraq confronting their dangerous enemy.)
This tactic is generally not conducive to creating a durable peace, but it is a good tactic for perpetuating and escalating conflict. But that’s now an acceptable goal, because it creates the rationale for increased military spending, making it possible to breed more chaos.
Recently a retired U.S. general went on television to declare that what’s needed to turn around the situation in the Ukraine is to simply “start killing Russians.” The Russians listened to that, marveled at his idiocy, and then went ahead and opened a criminal case against him. Now this general will be unable to travel to an ever-increasing number of countries around the world for fear of getting arrested and deported to Russia to stand trial.
This is largely a symbolic gesture, but non-symbolic non-gestures of a preventive nature are sure to follow. You see, my fellow space travelers, murder happens to be illegal. In most jurisdictions, inciting others to murder also happens to be illegal. Americans have granted themselves the license to kill without checking to see whether perhaps they might be exceeding their authority. We should expect, then, that as their power trickles away, their license to kill will be revoked, and they will find themselves reclassified from global hegemons to mere murderers.
As empires collapse, they turn inward, and subject their own populations to the same ill treatment to which they subjected others. Here, America is unexceptional: the number of Americans being murdered by their own police, with minimal repercussions for those doing the killing, is quite stunning. When Americans wonder who their enemy really is, they need look no further.
But that is only the beginning: the precedent has already been set for deploying U.S. troops on U.S. soil. As law and order break down in more and more places, we will see more and more U.S. troops on the streets of cities in the U.S., spreading death and destruction just like they did in Iraq or in Afghanistan.
“No More Malarkey” Joe Biden (with Obama advising him) just nominated Vilsack, one of Monsanto’s best friends, to head the US Department of Agriculture.
Under Obama, Vilsack brought us cloned farm animals, lab-grown meat and more GMOs than any Agriculture Secretary before or after him.
During his eight years under Obama, Tom Vilsack earned the nickname “Mr. Monsanto” for approving more new genetically modified organisms than any Agriculture Secretary in history, and for making gobs of money for every approval.
• Roundup Ready sugar beets. A judge ruledMonsanto’s sugar beets would inevitably contaminate other crops, eventually “eliminating a consumer’s choice to eat non-genetically engineered food.”
• Roundup Ready alfalfa. Monsanto’s first genetically modified perennial went wild, costing alfalfa growers millions.
• Monsanto’s DroughtGard corn. The GMO seeds actually ended up yielding 11% LESS corn than conventional corn during the 2012 drought.
• Dicamba-tolerant Xtend soy and cotton. Several states have banned Monsanto’s dicamba herbicide since its approval in 2015, after it drifted and destroyedmillions of acres of conventional soy, as well as nurseries, vineyards, vegetables, trees and native plants.
• Roundup Ready lawn grass. Vilsack toldthe Scotts Miracle-Gro it didn’t need permits to sell genetically engineered grass commercially.
• Agrisure corn. Vilsack allowed Syngenta to sellcorn seed with genetically engineered traits that were illegal in China to U.S. farmers. The corn crop was rejected by the markets, costing farmers $1.5 billion.
• Ethanol-only corn. Unsuitable for human or animal consumption, Syngenta’s ethanol corn has the potential to destroy the genome of edible corn where cross contamination occurs.
• Innate potatoes. The former Monsanto scientist who invented this “RNA interference” GMO exposed the dangers of his work four years after Vilsack approved it. He found an accumulation of toxins in the potatoes, and even scarier, he found their double-stranded RNA enters the human bloodstream, where it can influence our own cell function.
• Arctic Apples. These ever-green apples don’t turn brown when they bruise or start to rot, and even retain their bright green pigment when they are juiced. These GMOs were also created using RNA interference technology.
• Cloned animals. When Vilsack was asked in 2010 if cloned cows or their offspring had made it into the North American food supply, he claimed he “didn’t know”. Needless to say, this aroused alarm. While Europe responded with an embargo, Vilsack left the door open for cloned animal products to be labeled “USDA Organic.”
“It is very likely that the offspring of cloned animals are now being used to produce organic milk and other food,” the Organic Consumer’s Association says.
• Synbio dairy substitutes. Vilsack allowed companies like Perfect Day to begin using genetically-altered yeast cultures to manufacture synthetic dairy substitutes. Most vegans have no idea their non-dairy cheese is a product genetic engineering.
• Lab-made meat. Vilsack gave companies like Memphis Meat the green light to engineer cell-cultured meat without requiring USDA inspection or labeling. A former USDA staffer of his ended up lobbying for the company.
Norway upped the number of deaths under investigation, from 23 last week to 33, while in Germany, health officials said they are investigating 10 deaths that occurred among elderly patients who received the COVID vaccine.
Norway health officials said last week they were investigating the deaths of 23 elderly people who died shortly after receiving the vaccine, and had confirmed 13 of those were directly related to the vaccine.
Today, Bloomberg reported that the number of deaths under investigation in Norway had risen to 33 and that all had occurred in people ranging from age 75 to 80. According to Bloomberg, Camilla Stoltenberg, head of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, said at a press conference today:
“It is important to remember that about 45 people die every day in nursing homes in Norway, so it is not a given that this represents any excess mortality or that there is a causal connection.”😉
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, which had originally prioritized the elderly for the vaccine, has since revised its advice to urge more caution when vaccinating the elderly, especially those with underlying conditions.
The institute told Bloomberg that “for those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences. For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant.”
The Institute also admitted to Global Times that the clinical trials that resulted in emergency approval of the vaccine included “very few people over the age of 85,” but added “we assume that the side effects will largely be the same in the elderly as in those over 65 years of age.”
According to the Global Times, a Beijing-based immunologist who requested anonymity said the mRNA vaccines had not proven safe for large-scale use or forpreventing infectious diseases. Noting that people over 80 have weaker immune systems, he said they should not receive the vaccine, but instead should take medicines to improve their immune systems.
Meanwhile, The BMJ and other news outlets reported last week that in Germany, the Paul Ehrlich Institute is investigating 10 deaths in people ranging in age from 79 to 93 who died shortly after receiving the COVID vaccine.
So far, there’s no word of any investigation into the deaths of 29 elderly people at a nursing home in New York. According to a Jan. 9 news report from Syracuse.com, a single nursing home in upstate New York vaccinated 193 residents beginning on Dec. 22 and subsequently reported 24 deaths within the span of a couple of weeks.
The facility attributed the deaths to a COVID-19 “outbreak,” even though there had been no COVID-19 deaths in any nursing homes in the entire county “until the first three deaths … were reported Dec. 29.”
Florida health officials and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are investigating the death of a 56-year-old doctor who died of a rare autoimmune disease 15 days after getting the Pfizer vaccine. A Johns Hopkins scientist told the New York Times it was a “medical certainty” that the death was related to Pfizer’s vaccine.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is investigating numerous severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, in healthcare workers who received the vaccine.
Sunday night, California health officials called for a pause on the use of a huge batch of Moderna’s COVID vaccine due to its ”higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions.” As The Defender reported this morning, California’s top epidemiologist Dr. Erica S. Pan is recommending providers pause the administration of lot ‘041L20A’ of the Moderna COVID vaccine.
According to the latest figures, updated Jan. 7, from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 66 deaths have been reported in the U.S. as being possibly related to a COVID vaccine. It’s estimated that only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported to VAERS.
Anyone who suspects an injury or death related to the COVID vaccine, or any vaccine, can go to the VAERS website and file a report.
On April 27, 2003, the Sydney Morning Herald in Australia ran a story during the SARS scare, warning the public that the surgical masks they were buying to protect themselves against the SARS flu virus were essentially useless — and they threatened heavy fines against anyone making claims that the masks offered any significant protection:
[Quote from 2003 Sydney Morning Herald]
Retailers who cash in on community fears about SARS by exaggerating the health benefits of surgical masks could face fines of up to $110,000.
NSW Fair Trading Minister Reba Meagher yesterday warned that distributors and traders could be prosecuted if it was suggested the masks offered unrealistic levels of protection from the disease.
“Penalties can range from fines of up to $22,000 for an individual or $110,000 for a corporation,” she said.
Health authorities have warned that surgical masks may not be an effective protection against the virus.
“Those masks are only effective so long as they are dry,” said Professor Yvonne Cossart of the Department of Infectious Diseases at the University of Sydney.
“As soon as they become saturated with the moisture in your breath they stop doing their job and pass on the droplets.”
(And viruses are much, much smaller than water droplets. Masks are not meant to filter viruses. -ed)
Professor Cossart said that could take as little as 15 or 20 minutes, after which the mask would need to be changed. But those warnings haven’t stopped people snapping up the masks, with retailers reporting they are having trouble keeping up with demand.
John Bell from the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, who owns a pharmacy in Woollahra, Sydney, said mask supplies were running low.
“At the moment we don’t have any because we haven’t been able to get any in the last few days,” Mr. Bell said. “In the early stages it was unbelievable; we’d get people coming in all the time.”
Mr Bell agreed with Professor Cossart’s assessment regarding the effectiveness of the masks.
“I think they’re of marginal benefit,” he said. “In a way they give some comfort to people who think they’re doing as much as they can do to prevent the infection.”
“We were told you need 16 layers on your mask for it to offer protection.”
Apparently, the major social media outlets are banning this story — but they needn’ t worry — this reality check won’t deter committed mask believers in the least.
The government knows these masks don’t protect anyone from anything — but they were never meant to.
But they do make it easy for the government to keep track of who is — and who is not — obeying.
They protect the government from the people — by keeping the public in a state of fear and subjection — and turning the public against each other rather than against their real oppressors.
And people proudly wear the masks as a virtuous sign that they are willing to sacrifice for the benefit of others –I’m doing it for you.
In reality, wearing a mask is proof of only one thing — that the person wearing it watches television and believes what they are seeing and hearing.
People who wear these masks have been bound and shackled without anyone even laying a hand on them.
The government want us to remain timid and weak while they plan our demise.
[America’s most respected novelist has some things to say about “Smotherlove” and how to preserve our masculine resources.]
By Taylor Caldwell, March 5, 1975
For you ladies: Let us sit down and talk confidentially together about a very important matter.
We women know that real, honest-to-God men hardly exist any more, that homosexualism has vastly increased and become overt in America, and that it has now, in Washington and New York, taken on respectability and élan and has an air of delicate chic.
We know now that the student body of our colleges, and the faculties, too, reek with feminine “males” and limp-wristed flits. Drugs and homosexuality are rampant among male youth. They seem to go together. We are not concerned just now over the fact that our government is permeated with deviates who are often manipulated by our nation’s enemies and are a terrible hazard to our country. We are mostly concerned at this immediate time with a general failure of manhood among boys, and most of us understand that it begins practically in the bassinet. We also know that such a national failure has brought down the great empires and republics of the past and may bring down America to ruin, too, unless the tendency can be reversed.
How can you be certain that your son, or sons, will escape the emasculating pollution? It is well-known that both sexes possess latent characteristics of the other sex, and that environment and companions of evil intent can bring out the submerged tendencies. To become a man, a boy must be treated as a man from the very cradle.
But first of all his mother must be a woman, whose husband is her dearest treasure above all else, whose children are SECONDARY to her mate in all things. A woman must be womanly — not just “feminine.” She must have the strong instincts of a woman, and a love for her home. A mother whose FIRST concern is “sex”, and clothes and personal indulgence and hairdos, will not produce a manly son.
I’ve known dozens of these “women,” and invariably their sons have been lightweights. How could they escape the insistent picture of self-indulgence and self-love which they saw every day of their lives as children, in their mothers? How could they not see with what indifference their fathers were treated, and how they were regarded as providers of goodies, and not as beloved? The mother was the Queen, arrogant, svelte, greedy, perfumed, silken, demanding all things — and so the little boys began to identify with these creatures, these heartless, stupid, selfish, grasping, inane and pretty things. Mama was Everything. She implied that firmly, herself. And boys want to be Everything, too. So they identify with Mama.
But the world cannot accommodate two “Everythings.” So lust for position leads to resentment. There is the root of this emasculation, even beyond what the head-shrinkers call Smotherlove.
It is no accident that homosexual men almost invariably hate their mothers. Homosexuals are made at home, from the very earliest years. Hatred for women — and for Mama in particular — is the homosexual’s most outstanding characteristic. One can feel honest compassion for them, and condemn their mothers, who are trivial women — and murderers of the best in their men, emasculators really.
So treat your son, from the very bassinet, to be manly. He is a human being and has dignity from his birth; he is not a cutesy toy; he is not “adorable.” He is not “sweet.” He is an embryo man. Treat him so. Let him see from infanthood that you respect his status and he will acquire pride in himself. The Smother type of woman corrupts, degrades, and emasculates her son. She excuses her neglect by calling it “giving her baby what she didn’t get in her own childhood.” She is living vicariously through their child, chasing her own unhealthy lust to be “Everything.” How many times have you seen it yourself?
And forget the absurd idea that children, even in the bassinet, are “helpless,” I’ve noticed that by the time a child — a boy especially — is a month old he has his mother’s number down exactly. He may not be able to talk, sit up, or speak, but he is extraordinarily bright and clear-eyed — far more than he will ever be again. Babies have no sentimentalities.
I’ve seen my grandsons, just crawling, sit up and ponder on how to devil Mama and get something they want. You could almost hear their little brains clicking as they turned the subject over in their minds. They considered whether a spell of yelling would accomplish things, or not. Then they looked at Mama most thoughtfully, weighing her possible reactions to the demand. And quite often I’ve seen them come to the conclusion that this time Mama was not in the mood, or the idea is hopeless, and they continued to crawl and go about their business.
It is this clarity of understanding and honest animal cunning which should be cultivated and made to work for the boy’s manly future. So, no matter how delightful your baby is, look at him with respect, and never – but never — use comfy-cozy-chintsy language to him. Give him your love and gentleness and tenderness, of course, and hug and kiss him when you wish — and you wish far more often than he will! – but again treat him with the dignity he deserves. Let him know at all times that you are on to him, and he’ll be delighted and amused in the dark little realistic heart of him, and he’ll respect you and honor you. Always be one step ahead of Johnny, and two steps ahead of his plottings. He’ll not only regard you with consideration when he is a baby but will be considerate of you when he is older, even during adolescence. No man, whether ten days old, ten years old, or twenty, has anything but contempt for the soft touch.
When he is a man, then, properly brought up by a proper mother, he will detest the whining and the deliberately helpless, the mendicant, and the faker, the malingerer and the feeble “Liberal.” He will be brave and proud and truly masculine, scornful of those who live, as Samuel Butler put it, “only to lick the platter clean and leave a pile of offal.” He will demand of others that they be men, too, and so will be a force of strength in a world which sadly lacks true men in these days. His voice will be loud and clear. Best of all, as Solomon says of true mothers, he will “rise up” and call his mother “blessed,” and say of her “all her ways were pleasantness and all her paths were peace.” What more can a mother desire?
“Tell it like it is.” That goes for your boy children. (Girls are less likely to believe Mama’s homey little lies and cutenesses, all dressed up in Sweet Phrases.) Therefore, tell your boy children the absolute truth on any occasion , no matter how tragic or distasteful or horrible it is. A man should learn the truth from his cradle.
Let us get it firmly in mind: Children are tough and resilient and hard nosed. They are not “petals and flowers” as Dr. Spock once insisted to me in a letter. They are saner and colder of heart and more adaptable and tougher than they will ever be after they reach their maturity. They have no illusions; the dreams of children are violent dreams, not concerned with gardens and fairies; their aims are strong and sturdy and ruthless, concerned with self. Above all, children catch on to darling euphemisms at once, and cooing lying voices and false smiles — and they despise them.
Children are primitive men – they are of the cave absolutely. We civilize them later, but civilization does not necessarily include lies. (In fact, any civilization based on lies, euphemisms, fantasies, unreal ideologies, and refusal to face the truth will inevitably die, and good riddance to it.) Now, primitive man knew all about life and death. He accepted both without fear and with realism. Men are born – men die. It is of one piece, to primitive man, and your child is long a primitive. As a realist, he deserves your respect and your truth.
My mother was a realist, and I honor her for that at least. When I was very young she introduced me to religion and told me the unvarnished truth about death; children need little comfort, they are filled to the brim with it from birth. When a child is taught that he is masculine he can take life “like it is,” and the hell with the immediate trouble or pain. We may become skeptical later – and who isn’t? – but at least as we grow older the idea remains in our minds, immutable, and can give us courage.
So introduce your boy child, especially, to religion even while he is in the bassinet. (Boys are far more timid and fragile than girls, as any mother of both can testify.) You may think your baby is too young for religion, but he is not. My own children at six months understood that I was praying by their bedsides, or crib-sides, before they could even speak. I know, for if I neglected the ceremony they cried and were insistent. Children are ritualists. Well, they may not have even understood to Whom I was praying, but they gathered the idea that it was One who protected them and remained with them through the night, and so they had no night-terrors. I heard one of my daughters, then only eighteen months old, talking over things quite seriously with God after I had kissed her good-night. And I had thought that she still was unaware! It was a lovely conversation, between an infant and her Guardian and her Father, and I am sure God listened to it with more tenderness and attention than He ever gives to sophisticated adult prayers – for it was pure and unaffected and right to the point. She wanted a teddy-bear, and she described it exactly, then fell asleep assured she would get it. (She did.)
I, myself, was not an exceptional child, except that I was bigger and stronger than most others, and more bellicose. But I knew to Whom I was praying when I was very young, indeed, and I knew the difference between good and evil. I knew there were no “situation ethics” or grey places in morals and behavior. You were either on the side of the angels, or on the side of the devils, and if the latter you could be absolutely certain that you would be painfully thrashed as soon as Mama or Papa caught you.
And that brings me to another point: corporal punishment. Dr. Spock and Company think children are too innocent and too lovely to be chastised. Nonsense! Again, children are primitive man. Primitive man knew that his parents wanted to protect or warn him of danger, and as speech was ineffective the blow did the work thoroughly. Watch animal mothers: They do not croon over their young ones and try to “persuade” them not to do naughty things or dangerous ones. They slam –and the youngster immediately learns that some things are forbidden. They love and cuddle their infants, but when a lesson in the realities of life is needed Animal Mama lifts her paw and lets go painfully, and does not comfort the culprit when he howls. In fact, he learns that he has to work hard to get back into her favor and the kitchen.
Girls, being slightly more civilized at birth than boys, are sometimes – I say sometimes – open more to reason. (But don’t bet on it!) So, when a girl is about twelve Mama can often “explain” things to Susie, and if Susie has learned to trust her mother she will listen. But boys are more determined and, when they are young, reason seems like a silly thing to them. They do understand the swift punishment; they respect pain. Don’t wait for Papa to come home to slam your boy-child. Slam him the moment he commits a crime, and slam hard. He may yell and say some incredible things to you, but he will respect the lessons of that good right hand which deals out immediate justice, as well as cookies and caresses.
“You will only teach them physical violence,” mourn the Dr. Spocks. Well, we have two whole generations reared on Dr. Spock and Company, and who has been more violent on the campuses, and who has been more savagely murderous on the streets? Our juvenile delinquents are the RESULT of the Spock philosophy. The assaulters of teachers and the old and the helpless were given “gentleness” a la Spock in their homes. Imply to a boy that no matter what he does he will be “loved”, and that he is the most important creature in the world, and he will become, even as a youth and a young man, cruel, arrogant, selfish, demanding, and fierce. When he comes up against the real world of life – unsheltered by pampering Mama — he will be outraged, for no one there will coddle him and defer to him and listen to his vaporings. And, he will take revenge on it. He will shriek “brutality!” when he is given the blows he ought to have had at home. He will be uncontrollable, savage, resentful, believing that everything should be granted to him and nothing demanded of him. He had been treated “democratically” by his parents, and so he will believe, as a youth, that his callow opinions are as good as anyone else’s, and that authority is something to be derided. For isn’t he the Real Authority? He had been taught that by Spock and Company.
Teach your boy children to work, and work arduously, even when toddlers. A three-year-old can help around the house. He can pull out chairs; he can dust; he can put away his own clothes and toys. He can dig weeds. He can hose lawns, straighten furniture, carry out garbage. He must learn that if he has a place in the family – an honored place – he also has responsibilities. By the time a boy enters his teens he should have a summer job, no matter how affluent his father.
And be honest about your boy’s inherent capabilities. If he is only average, or less, in elementary school and high school, consider having him taught a trade instead of sending him off to some liberal arts college, where he will learn “dissent” and radicalism. Good machinists and mechanics and plumbers are worth their weight in gold, and always will be. Don’t listen to the educationists. A successful life doesn’t depend on a college diploma! Half the eminent men and women in the Who’s Who books never went to any college – though later they did receive honorary Ph.D.s. Intelligence is never learned or acquired. It is inherent in a child’s genes. No education – never mind what the self-serving educationists say! – can increase a child’s capacities for learning and understanding and intellect. These things are in him or they are not.
If your children manifest a capacity, through marks, for higher learning, then go to it, but pick out a really decent college and not a “democratic” one. There are still religion-oriented colleges in the United States, and private ones. So be realistic about your children. If Johnny wants to be an automobile mechanic or plumber – and that is where his aptitude is – don’t wail about what the neighbors will think, or what the teachers say. Give him what he needs with your honest blessing – his manhood and self-respect and success will depend upon it.
To make American boys manly, don’t be cute with your sons. The English language is rich and vibrant and full of millions of shadings and meanings. Don’t use a “cute” word when a good Anglo-Saxon word will be better. Don’t be “homey” with your boys. Don’t handle them in public! I’ve seen Spock-mothers pawing their half-grown boys in supermarkets and on the street, patting them, cuddling them, resting their hands on their shoulders, embracing them. Disgusting! A real boy hates it. Keep your hands to yourself, Mama. Treat your boy’s manhood with respect, even when alone with him. You can’t begin too soon.
There is a sort of woman – you have probably met her – who softly groans about her “Maternal Instincts,” and presses her hands to her bosom, rolls her teary eyes and admits, confesses, that she is “all mother” and just can’t help loving up her young son before her audience. She begs you, with those wet eyes, to “understand,” and then to applaud her or at least to give her a sentimental smile in return. Funny thing, though: She isn’t overcome with maternal passion when with her daughters, and doesn’t handle THEM in public!
You want your son to be a man when he enters his teens, and not a girl in a boy’s body, nor the sort of male who will be a “boy” until the day his weary wife either shoots him or divorces him or leaves him, nor the kind who will whimper that he won’t defend his house nor his family, but will only “love” an aggressor.
There is one “boy” however whom you may cuddle, pamper, cosset, hug and kiss to your heart’s content, and be rewarded handsomely for it, and be appreciated. That “boy” is your husband. Lavish on him your affection; delight in him; praise him even when you’d like to kick him where it would do a lot of good; tell him he is marvelous and magnificent. Men have left their wives for many reasons, but not one I know of has left a wife who truly cares for him. Pretty legs are a dime a dozen, and so are inflated bosoms and mini-skirts and perfumed hands and lacquered hair. A man likes them, but if his wife is a mother to him as well as a sweetheart he will think she is the loveliest woman on earth, above rubies, beyond price, no matter if she is overweight and doesn’t have beautiful hair. A woman like that is not stupid! Only the professional “mothers” are, with their feminine sons and disgusted daughters.
The present generation of children and the present generation of young adults from the age of thirteen to eighteen is no different from that of their great-great-grandparents. Political fads come and go; theories rise and fall; the scientific “truth” of today becomes the discarded error of tomorrow. Man’s ideas change, but not his inherent nature. That remains. So, if the children are monstrous today – even criminal – it is not because their natures have become polluted, but because they have not been taught better, or disciplined.
Withhold not correction from a child: for if you beat him with the rod he will not die. You shall beat him with the rod and shall deliver him from death.
He who spares his rod hates his son: but he who loves him chastens him early.
The love of my life, my husband Gregory Michael MD, an Obstetrician that had his office in Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, died the day before yesterday due to a strong reaction to the COVID vaccine.
He was a very healthy 56 year old, loved by everyone in the community delivered hundreds of healthy babies and worked tireless through the pandemic. [How many of those babies’ lives were ruined by his vaccines? – ed]
He was vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine at MSMC ( Mount Sinai Medical Center) on December 18. Three days later he saw a strong set of petechiae (red patches indicating blood leaking from capillaries under the skin) on his feet and hands which made him seek attention at the emergency room at MSMC. The blood count that was done at his arrival showed his platelet count to be 0 (A normal platelet count ranges from 150,000 to 450,000 platelets per microliter of blood.) He was admitted in the ICU with a diagnosis of acute ITP (immune thrombocytopenic purpura) caused by a reaction to the COVID vaccine. A team of expert doctors tried for 2 weeks to raise his platelet count to no avail. Experts from all over the country were involved in his care. No matter what they did, the platelets count refused to go up. He was conscious through the whole process but 2 days before a last resort surgery, he got a hemorrhagic stroke caused by the lack of platelets that took his life in a matter of minutes.
He was a pro vaccine advocate that is why he got it himself.
Do not let his death be in vain. Please save more lives by making this information news.
In a federal complaint filed last month in the U.S. District Court of California, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores presented results of a pilot study showing unvaccinated adults and children are healthier than their vaccinated counterparts.
Greg Glaser, Esq. 01/06/21
On Feb. 22, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores will be in federal court in Sacramento to request an order immediately protecting all Americans from discrimination based on vaccination status.
Glaser and Flores represent The Control Group, which is a recently completed pilot survey of unvaccinated Americans showing 1,248% better health for unvaccinated adults and 1,099% better health for unvaccinated children.
In the federal complaint filed December 2020 in the U.S. District Court of California — Eastern District, Sacramento, Glaser and Flores state:
“As a matter of national security, this constitutional case is respectfully brought by scientifically focused patriotic Americans, including United States military family members. The American population is currently in the process of being decimated by chronic illness, due to injured and dysfunctional immune systems … The Control Group dataset provides profound proof that vaccine exposure is in fact the primary cause of this nation’s current public health crisis.”
According to Glaser, here is the case in a nutshell:
“America is dying from the current trajectory of chronic illness. Our Control Group pilot survey proved it is the vaccines causing our nation’s demise. And even the government’s own admissions make it clear vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. There is no single agency such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that can be petitioned to heal the whole nation, nor a single law such as SB277 that can be overturned to heal this nation from the current trajectory. That is why Ray Flores and I are requesting comprehensive relief in the form of an executive order preventing discrimination based on vaccination status. If we prevail, then every American will be protected from mandatory vaccination.”
Glaser said he believes this case is the most comprehensive presentation of evidence to date on vaccine harm. For example, Glaser and Flores have 400+ top-level science exhibits offered for judicial notice, which requires the court to accept certain statements made by government officials and other authoritative sources. A key goal of this judicial notice technique is to help shift the legal burden to the state to prove vaccine safety. According to Glaser, because the State has no vaxxed versus unvaxxed study, the state cannot meet its legal burden.
Judicial Notice #1 connects all these chronic illnesses (i.e., digestive disorders, diabetes) to the immune system with the most authoritative citations on the planet.
Judicial Notice #2 shows that vaccines are dangerous and untested — once again all of these are authoritative citations the government cannot dispute.
And Judicial Notice #3 shows how vaccines are made and distributed through communist China.
A great deal of the complaint is devoted to insisting that control groups are necessary to the scientific method, and the court’s job is to preserve this particular vital evidence necessary to rescue America from the current trajectory of chronic illness.
Some evidence highlights from the case include:
National data of vaccinated children show approximately 54% have a chronic health condition. But in The Control Group of unvaccinated children, the number is only 6%. That means vaccination causes an 800% increased risk of chronic illness in children. This has now been proven with a 99% confidence interval. Moreover, this pattern is repeated over and over in The Control Group data with 99% confidence: diabetes (0% in the unvaccinated Control Group v. 10% in the vaccinated), digestive disorders (0.4% in the unvaccinated v. 18% in the vaccinated), ADHD (0.47% in the unvaccinated v. 9.4% in the vaccinated).
The Control Group provides numerical proof that vaccines are causing chronic illness. For example, the p-value (probability or odds) that the excess health conditions seen in the vaccinated population under the age of 18 are not due to vaccine exposure is 1 in 84,721,527,559,728,800,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
The calculated Pearson correlation coefficient shows a “very high correlation” between the increase in the CDC vaccine schedule and the increase in these chronic illnesses. This is another numerical proof showing vaccines are causing chronic illness.
America is suffering an epidemic of chronic illness caused by vaccination. The nation will collapse on the current trajectory of vaccination.
Vaccination is unavoidably unsafe. It is a form of experimental biological alteration of the human immune system.
Improved living conditions (not vaccination) are responsible for historical improvement of public health.
In early 2020, the WHO accepted a PCR test for “SARS-CoV-2” that was designed without having found the virus. Yet the test is meant to detect…the missing virus. This is evidence of deep criminal intent. The PCR tests have served to vastly inflate the “cases” of COVID (not ill people, but people who show “positive” by the fake test). The more fake tests, the more false positives – thus inflating the number of meaningless “cases” by which the “pandemic” is being prosecuted.
But as of December 14, 2020, WHO calculated that a correction was needed to prepare for the coming vaccination record. By introducing their “correction” they have blown their cover. Why?
Two reasons. Huge numbers of people are starting to catch on to the PCR test scam. Also, WHO now needs to pave the way for a coming “decline in COVID case numbers” — thereby making it appear the new vaccine will be having a positive effect. I predicted this development.
A brief review. The PCR test (a complete fraud for several reasons) is run in “cycles.” Each cycle is a giant magnification of a tiny portion of the swab sample taken from the patient.
As I’ve reported, even Tony Fauci readily asserts that if the PCR is run at 35 cycles or higher, it’s meaningless.
Every positive result—supposedly indicating “infection with the virus”—resulting from running the test at 35 cycles or higher is meaningless.
BUT, as I’ve also pointed out, public health agencies recommend running the PCR test at up to 40 cycles if need be to find evidence of a virus. Therefore, labs comply.
Therefore, millions upon millions of PCR tests results, over the last nine months, which indicated “infection,” are are lies; outrageous frauds.
Therefore, the COVID case numbers are a vast lie, and the lockdowns, which are based on those numbers, are absurd, insane, criminal, and predatory.
So now the WHO is walking back their stance on how the PCR should be run, for obvious reasons to slip into the next phase of their plandemic.
Here are the key quotes. The language is mealy-mouthed, intentionally confusing, cautious, and sterile. Nevertheless, we can see their intent to lower the number of test cycles.
Now they are changing their instructions: “Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU [Information for Use] carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.”
Translation: Using too many test cycles—aka “high cycle threshold (Ct) value”—has resulted in patients being told they’re infected, when they really weren’t.
“In some cases, the IFU will state that the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise.”
Translation: Running the test with a high number of cycles yields “background noise”—aka a false positive result. The patient is told he’s infected but he’s not.
“The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value (needed cycles) will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”
Translation: When the test is run with a high number of cycles, we can’t tell the difference between “irrelevant” and “meaningful.”
A frank and honest translation of the WHO message: “We’re changing the way we’re doing PCR tests. We have been running them with a high number of cycles and getting millions of false positives, and those numbers were deployed to justify the lockdowns—but NOW we’re moving to a lower number of cycles. This change, along with cutting back on the number of tests, will result in fewer positive results, fewer case numbers, making the vaccine look VERY GOOD.”
The WHO is still crazy, still criminal, but not entirely stupid. They know what they’re doing and why.
The WHO claimed that “various hygiene (including mask wearing) and physical distancing measures…likely played a role in reducing influenza virus transmission.”
Masks are ineffective and potentially harmful to health. We’ve known this for years.
Masks are porous. They have to be. Otherwise wearers would suffocate.
Aerosol spores are minuscule. Way too small to be filtered by masks. They penetrate all masks and concentrate beneath them risking greater harm to wearers than if they are avoided altogether.
Everything mandated or recommended this year for “protection” did more harm than good – notably from lost jobs and income during lockdowns and quarantines.
The CDC casually said “seasonal influenza activity in the United States remains lower than usual for this time of year.”
It practically disappeared — or was it disguised as something else?
Covid is nothing more than “seasonal influenza” in disguise. The tests are bogus.
In its latest weekly reporting period, the CDC said:
“The percentage of respiratory specimens testing positive for influenza at clinical laboratories is” one-10th of 1%.
It’s practically nonexistent. No one is dying from flu because flu cases are being reported as COVID. Even unrelated illnesses are being called COVID. People are dying in hospitals where doctors and nurses are being directed to use unproven protocols resulting in neglect and mistreatment of patients. This is not a good time to look for help from hospitals. The COVID pandemic (so-called) is a fraud based on fraudulent testing and fraudulent reporting from hospitals. Remember this when/if you think about submitting to hospital care these days.
For the three-month period in the US ending in late December, findings of flu cases were virtually the same.
There’s almost no seasonal influenza showing up this year because their tests are designed to ignore the possibility of flu and just label them COVID.
While high numbers of COVID is being falsely reported (due to bogus tests), the death toll remains extremely low.
If accurately identified, those cases would be called influenza – the same that shows up annually in the US and abroad like clockwork.
It’s accompanied by fear-mongering mass hysteria, lockdowns, quarantines, mask-wearing, social distancing, and not surprisingly: The transfer of unprecedented amounts of wealth, from average people, to the wealthy.
The billionaires are enjoying a bonanza of riches from what’s going on at the government, banking, and corporate level. Billionaires are gaining obscene amounts of money while the common people are losing what little they had.
Truth is, what they’re calling COVID is only the seasonal influenza.
The media disappeared the flu season for 2020 by renaming it COVID.
And by that little trick, along with the fake PCR tests, America was plunged into a fake pandemic “emergency” and thrown into lockdown.