Lockdown Restrictions Are A Test To See How Much Tyranny Americans Will Accept

 
Brandon Smith – 8/12/2020

The pandemic lockdowns are a complicated issue, and that is absolutely deliberate. The point of 4th Generation psychological warfare is to present the target individual or population with a hard choice – a no-win scenario. You are damned if you do and damned if you don’t. I often equate this to the key moves in a difficult chess game; your primary goal is to create a dual threat and force your opponent to sacrifice one piece over another in order to escape with the least amount of damage. Do this a few times and you have won the long game.

There are multiple aspects to the global pandemic which seem engineered to push our society to make “sacrificial decisions”. We can choose to sacrifice the lives of those that are susceptible to the virus, sacrifice our economy, or sacrifice many of our freedoms with the promise that the economy and lives will be protected. The easiest choice is always to give away a little more freedom. We’ll get it all back eventually…right?

Of course, we don’t actually get to “choose” anything when we play along with this game. 4th Gen warfare is meant to eventually take IT ALL from the target population while making people think it was their choice to give those things away.

To be clear, it’s not only the pandemic being exploited as leverage to conjure these situations. The leftist riots are another example of a bought and paid for crisis that is being used in an attempt to convince half of Americans that breaking constitutional principles and instituting unprecedented government power is somehow an acceptable sacrifice. The riots and the virus response work hand-in-hand; one is created to get leftists to demand totalitarianism in the name of public safety, the other is created to get conservatives to demand totalitarianism in the name of public safety.

The solution always ends up being totalitarian government. There are those that would have you believe that this is the only way. The new propaganda meme out there is:

Silly libertarians live in a fantasy world where freedom is valued over security in times of crisis. We don’t have the luxury of freedom when communist terrorists/deadly virus threaten to destroy the fabric of our society…”

Sound familiar? Yes, this nonsense narrative is everywhere on forums and message boards these days, almost as if someone was paying people to inject it into everyday discussion. The problem is, I’ve seen this all before. Right after the events of 9/11, America went insane for at least a few years, hyper-focused on the fake threat of terrorists while ignoring the greater root danger of lying enemies inside the government. The number of natural liberties being violated in the name of “beating the terrorists” was staggering, and the number of mostly conservative citizens cheering for this at the time was immense.

Today’s calls for overreaching government power in the name of “beating coronavirus” or “beating the extreme left” are no different. In the wake of widespread fear, people suffer from fits of temporary madness that allows them to rationalize idiocy.

I’ve never really understood that aspect of behavior among certain groups. I’ve never been so fearful of losing my life that I was willing to hand over anything including the freedom of me and my family on the mere chance that I could stay alive just a little longer. But for some, that blind fear, self-absorption, egocentricity, and fixation dominates their every waking moment.

To me, this would be a torturous and empty existence. What do these people have to live for anyway? Obviously they don’t care about their children because they are willing to give away their children’s future just for a false sense of safety today.

______________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Lockdown Restrictions Are A Test To See How Much Tyranny Americans Will Accept

The pandemic pattern—how the illusion is built

 

Jon Rappaport – August 13, 2020

This article is based on my study and investigation of so-called epidemics over the past 30 years.

In the case of COVID-19, I’ve written at least one piece covering, in detail, each main element of the illusion.  Here, I’m laying out the pattern.  It is the same for each fake epidemic.

ONE: Through many meetings, exercises, planning sessions, a structure is welded in place to promote and launch the IDEA of an epidemic.  World Health Organization, CDC, influential public health officials attached to governments around the world, etc.

TWO: There is a purported incident.  An outbreak.  The most obvious cause is intentionally overlooked.  For example, horrendous air pollution, or the grotesque feces and urine pollution on a giant commercial pig factory-farm.  Instead, the world is told a new virus has been found.  Local researchers, if any, are augmented by researchers from CDC, WHO.

THREE: There is no air-tight chain of evidence explaining exactly how the purported new virus was discovered.  From details released, there is NO proof of discovery by convincing methods, no proper unified study of MANY supposed epidemic patients.

FOUR: But WHO/CDC tells the world this is an epidemic in the making, caused by the new virus.  The promotion and propaganda/media apparatus moves into high gear.  Ominous pronouncements.

FIVE: Diagnostic tests for the unproven new virus are rolled out.  They spit out false “proof” of “infection” like coins from a jackpot slot machine.  These false-positives are an inherent feature of the tests.

SIX: Thus, all case numbers and death numbers, which are based on the tests, are rendered meaningless.  And…they were already meaningless, because the supposed new virus “being tested for” was never properly discovered in the first place.

SEVEN: Nevertheless, these tests (plus useless eyeball diagnosis) are used to build official reports on case numbers.  For the duration of the “epidemic,” reports keep coming, and escalating numbers are trumpeted.  Within the basically meaningless structure of these reports, there is fiddling with totals, to make them more impressive and frightening.

EIGHT: Real people are really getting sick and dying, but for the most part, they are people who are dying from traditional and long-standing conditions—flu-like illness, pneumonia, other lung infections, etc.  These people are “re-packaged” under the new epidemic label—e.g., “COVID”.  The official description of the “new epidemic disease”—the clinical symptoms—is sufficiently general to easily allow this re-packaging.

NINE: If there is new illness, it can be explained by causes having nothing to do with the purported new virus.  For example, a toxic vaccine campaign.  A highly destructive drug.  Highly toxic pesticides.

TEN: Over time, the definition of the epidemic is arbitrarily widened to include more symptoms and clinical features, in order to inflate case numbers.

ELEVEN: Control of information about the “epidemic” is hardened at the top.  The talking heads, from the press and public health agencies, know as much about actual science as rabbits know about drone strikes.  But they are “in charge.”  Dissident information is attacked and censored.

TWELVE: Medical drugs and procedures (e.g., ventilators) used to treat patients are quite harmful.  If a vaccine is rolled out, it, too, is toxic.  Illness and death resulting from these and other medical attacks are counted as “epidemic cases caused by the virus.”

THIRTEEN: ABOVE ALL OTHER ILLUSIONS, the main deception is: “the epidemic is one disease or syndrome caused by one germ.”  This is sold with unceasing propaganda.  Most people fall for it.  They will even argue among themselves about which “it” is the single cause of the “it” disease.  There is no “it” cause or disease.

FOURTEEN: The public is sold lie after lie about contagion and the “spread” of the “it.”

FIFTEEN: The public chants (as if no one has ever died before), “People are dying, it must be the virus.”

SIXTEEN: The virus fairy tale always functions as a cover story for government or corporate or medical crimes.  It obscures and hides these crimes.  For example, a large factory is spewing horrendous pollution into the ground and water of an area, and people are getting sick and dying?  Wait, the researchers say, the cause is actually a new virus no one has ever seen before.

As I wrote at the outset of the COVID illusion, the only difference this time, in 2020, is the weight of the lies—because they led to the lockdowns and the economic devastation.  This is West Nile, SARS, Swine Flu, Zika, writ large.

Needless to say, the persons and groups responsible for launching these illusion-operations must hide their crimes.

The criminals have their weapons, of course.  Among their most powerful: control of the press, and arcane technical language which pretends to relevance.  This language is so dense, the uninitiated stand no chance of penetrating it.

For instance, researchers can babble for hours about their vaunted diagnostic test, the PCR.  However, the simple truth is, the test has never been vetted.  The test has never been tested in the real world outside the lab.

I have written about this extensively.  Using a little guideline called SCIENCE, you would “test the test” by lining up, say, a thousand patients, some healthy, some sick from a supposed virus.  Any virus.  Tissue samples would be taken from each patient.

PCR mavens would run these samples through their equipment, reporting which patients show what they call high “viral load.”

This means: these particular patients have millions and millions of virus actively replicating in their bodies, and they will be unmistakably and visibly sick.

The PCR princes would then announce, “Patients 3,45,65,76,132…are all definitely sick.”

Now we un-blind the study and see what’s what and who’s who.  Are these designated patients ill or are they running marathons?  That’s called simple scientific method.  Not technical gobbledygook.

This chunk of research has never been done.  It never will be done.  It’s too real.  Too naked.  Proponents of the PCR would have too much to lose, if their assessments of who are healthy and who are sick turned out to be absurdly wrong, and their arcane technical rhetoric about the PCR ended up being useless gibberish.

I include this illustration to indicate there are, indeed, ways of exposing professional liars, if you change the venue on them, if you use common sense, if you stand outside their self-appointed temples of mystical pretense and observe what their lies look like when you boil them down to human terms…

Here is another study of the PCR test that has never been done and never will be done, in the real world: line up a thousand patients, take tissues samples from them and send the samples to 40 different labs.  Have the labs run their PCRs and announce their specific findings.  Compare the results.  You can bet the farm the labs will come up with contrary results.

This is part of a pattern: keep “scientific details” close to the vest; keep them “in-house”; don’t permit large-scale independent studies that will either confirm or deny basic tenets of official research.

COVID is a fraud from top to bottom.  From beginning to end.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on The pandemic pattern—how the illusion is built

Belarus president unwilling to accept bribe money from World Bank and IMF for submitting to their quarantine, isolation, and curfew measures

[You may wonder why politicians worldwide, news programs, doctors, etc. are parroting the lines about the dangers of COVID-19 if it is all fake. Well, here is the reason – they are being bribed and bullied. Plus, here is Belarus’ president who is honest enough to NOT accept the bribes that are ruining country after country. It’s too bad US politicians are selling us out.]

MINSK, 19 June (BelTA) – Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko asked the participants of a finances meeting how things were with the provision of bank credit assistance to Belarus. “What are our partners’ requirements?” It was announced that they can provide Belarus with $940 million in so-called rapid financing.

But Lukashenko learned that there were additional conditions which he considered unacceptable for the country. He was referring to the bank’s demands to model Belarus’ coronavirus response on that of Italy.

“I do not want to see the Italian situation to repeat in Belarus. We have our own country and our own situation,” the president said.

According to the president, the World Bank was interested in Belarus’ coronavirus response practices. “It is ready to fund us ten times more than it offered initially as a token of commendation for our efficient fight against this virus. The World Bank has even asked the Healthcare Ministry to share the experience. Meanwhile, the IMF continues to demand from us quarantine measures, isolation, a curfew. This is nonsense. We will not dance to anyone’s tune,” said the president.

[NOTE: This is not to praise the Belarus government, but rather to expose the World Bank, the IMF, and other monied entities – mostly in the West – who are driving the corrupt politicians and doctors around the world to accept bribe money and join the movement to ruin their countries. The COVID problem is not a virus – rather it is corrupt governments that sell out their countries for money and power.]

_______________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Belarus president unwilling to accept bribe money from World Bank and IMF for submitting to their quarantine, isolation, and curfew measures

World’s Top Epidemiologists – Masks Don’t Work!

People in Copenhagen, Denmark, Don’t Wear Masks
Tyler Durden – 8/8/2020

Denmark boasts one of the lowest COVID-19 death rates in the world – (Even with CDC’s fake over-inflated test figures). As of August 4, the Danes have suffered 616 COVID-19 deaths, according to figures from Johns Hopkins University.

That’s less than one-third of the number of Danes who die from pneumonia or influenza in a given year.

Despite this success, Danish leaders recently found themselves on the defensive. The reason is that Danes aren’t wearing face masks, and local authorities for the most part aren’t even recommending them.

This prompted Berlingske, the country’s oldest newspaper, to complain.”

“The whole world is wearing face masks, even Donald Trump,” Berlingske pointed out.

This apparently did not sit well with Danish health officials.

From left to right: Professor Henning Bundgaard, Tamara van Ark, Anders Tegnell

They responded by noting there is little conclusive evidence that face masks are an effective way to limit the spread of respiratory viruses.

 

All these countries recommending face masks haven’t made their decisions based on new studies,” said Henning Bundgaard, chief physician at Denmark’s Rigshospitale, according to Bloomberg News.

Denmark is not alone.

Despite a global stampede of mask-wearing, data show that 80-90 percent of people in Finland and Holland say they “never” wear masks when they go out, a sharp contrast to the 80-90 percent of people in Spain and Italy (that claim high numbers of infections) who say they “always” wear masks when they go out.

Dutch public health officials recently explained why they’re not recommending masks.

“From a medical point of view, there is no evidence of a medical effect of wearing face masks, so we decided not to impose a national obligation,” said Medical Care Minister Tamara van Ark.

Others, echoing statements similar to the US Surgeon General from early March, said masks could make individuals sicker and exacerbate the spread of the virus.

“Face masks in public places are not necessary, based on all the current evidence,” said Coen Berends, spokesman for the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.

“There is no benefit and there may even be negative impact.”

In Sweden, where COVID-19 deaths have slowed to a crawl, public health officials say they see “no point” in requiring individuals to wear masks.

“With numbers diminishing very quickly in Sweden, we see no point in wearing a face mask in Sweden, not even on public transport,” said Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s top infectious disease expert.

The top immunologists and epidemiologists in the world can’t decide if masks are helpful in reducing the spread of COVID-19. Indeed, we’ve seen organizations like the World Health Organization…

…and the CDC go back and forth in their recommendations…

Bottom line … face masks accomplish only one thing. They identify the individuals who are non-thinking slaves and like government tyranny.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on World’s Top Epidemiologists – Masks Don’t Work!

If COVID Fatalities Were Counted Correctly, By Industry Standard Method Used For More Than 17 Years, The Real Count Would Be 90.2% Lower

8/3/20 – Children’s Health Defense

(New CDC-contrived rules for counting COVID cases and deaths are being used to create a fake “pandemic” where none actually exists.)

What They Are Not Telling You About Data Through July 12th

  • According to the CDC, 101 children age 0 to 14 have died from influenza, while 31 children have died from COVID-19.
  • According to the CDC, 131,332 Americans have died from pneumonia and 121,374 from COVID-19 as of July 11th, 2020.
  • Why hasn’t the CDC declared a pneumonia pandemic?
  • Had the CDC had been using the correct industry standard for counting death by COVID, the COVID-19 fatality count would be approximately 90.2% lower.

The CDC has instructed hospitals, medical examiners, coroners and physicians to collect and report COVID-19 data by significantly different standards than all other infectious diseases and causes of death.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were instituted by the CDC in private, and without open discussion among qualified professionals that are free from conflicts of interest.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were additionally instituted despite the existence of effective rules for data collection and reporting, successfully used by all hospitals, medical examiners, coroners, and physicians for more than 17 years.

As a result, elected officials have enacted many questionable policies that have injured our country.

This paper will present significant evidence to support the position that if the CDC simply employed their 2003 industry standard for data collection and reporting, which has been successfully used nationwide for 17 years; the total fatalities attributed to COVID-19 would be reduced by an estimated 90.2%, and questions would be non-existent regarding schools reopening and whether or not Americans should be allowed to work.

Apparently state health departments have been instructed by the CDC to over-count COVID fatalities, cases, and hospitalizations.

According to the CDC’s Provisional COVID-19 Death Counts By Sex, Age & State, we know the following data from Feb 1, 2020 through July 11th, 2020.

  • Three times as many children in the 0 to 14 age demographic have died from influenza (101) compared to COVID-19 (31).
  • In the 0 to 14 age demographic, there have been 11,158 reported fatalities from all causes.
  • Thus, COVID-19 fatalities in the 0 to 14 age demographic make up a very small 0.0278% of all fatalities.

There is more data when looking at the 15 to 24 age demographic.

  • 41.2% more teens and college age young adults, in the 15 to 24 age demographic, have died from pneumonia (267) compared to COVID-19 (157).

We would not consider closing closing down the country for typical seasonal flu or pneumonia fatalities, so why did we close it down when COVID-19 numbers are even lower?

As encouraging as this data is, we have concerns regarding data collection and reporting that potentially lowers current fatality counts by 90.2%. It is very possible that state health departments have been instructed by the CDC to over-count COVID fatalities, cases, and hospitalizations.

There is no more significant risk of fatality from contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus than there is for developing pneumonia.

Children Are Recovering 99.9584% of the Time From COVID-19.’

Risk of fatality increases substantially for Americans over age 50 with at least 1 of the following comorbidities: Hypertension, Diabetes, Elevated Cholesterol, Kidney Disease, Dementia, Heart Disease. For perspective, according to the CDC, the risk of dying from pneumonia is higher than the risk of dying from COVID-19 in the 55 to 64 age demographic.

Since February 1st, fatalities in the 55 to 64 age demographic had a 12% greater risk of dying from pneumonia than COVID-19. COVID-19 fatalities in the 55 to 64 age demographic make up 8.21% of all fatalities and the risk of fatality due to COVID-19 is on par with the risk of fatality associated with contracting pneumonia, 9.21%.

And when you consider the fact that the above statistics are based on the CDC’s faked method of counting COVID cases and deaths, the true numbers would be something like 90% lower.

Five times more people are being tested today than back in April, but the number of hospitalizations from COVID are about the same. While more “cases” are listed due to a drastic increase of  testing, almost all are asymptomatic, and even fewer are hospitalized.

The CDC knew in early March that the vast majority of fatalities would be in people over 60 with comorbidities.

It is a disease that affects most seriously older adults. Starting at age 60, there is an increasing risk of disease, and the risk increases with age. People with diabetes, heart disease, lung disease and other serious underlying conditions are more likely to develop serious outcomes, including death. The large majority of fatalities recorded were in nursing homes in people over 70 who had comorbidities. Plus, the test for COVID antibodies is terribly unreliable and inaccurate. So no one really knows if the official count means anything at all.

How is it that America has been shut down by a phantom virus that, even if it is real, is far less contagious or dangerous than the common flu? Who and what are behind this faked pandemic? Ask yourself, what is the real purpose?

(Obviously the COVID case-counting and death-number counting is a complete fraud.

For example: in a nursing home or hospital, chills and fever, or cough, are sufficient to label a patient a “probable case of COVID,” if he was also in contact with a “risk cohort,” as defined by public health authorities. Thus, it would be one more case to add to the official number of COVID cases. One more meaningless statistic with which to plant fear in the heads of mindless Americans.

This means that for an elderly person living in a nursing home—the whole home would be a “risk cohort”—who coughs, or who has chills and fever, could be diagnosed, with no test, as a “probable case of COVID.”

Why the hoax? Medical dictators are squeezing out every possible number they can, by any means, to justify their rampant economic and human destruction.

The lockdowns and shutdowns have nothing to do with disease.

Also—case numbers sell vaccines, and selling vaccines is the CDC’s main business activity.)

__________________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on If COVID Fatalities Were Counted Correctly, By Industry Standard Method Used For More Than 17 Years, The Real Count Would Be 90.2% Lower

Trump Tells NRA, ‘The Left is Coming for Your Guns’ As He’s Been Quietly Taking Your Guns All Along

4, 27, 2019

On Friday, President Donald Trump vowed to fight for the Second Amendment rights of Americans as he spoke to members of the National Rifle Association. While Trump claimed to be a champion of gun rights, however, his record says something entirely different.

During the speech, Trump claimed that the “left is coming for your guns,” and he’s correct.

But Trump is coming for your guns too!

If you are still so obtuse as to think you can trust Republicans, you’d better jump in bed and cover up your head. Republicans are just as bad as Democrats. Both are liars and criminals. It is the nature of the Beast System – all parties – all politicians. The system prevents honest leadership.

As politicians and anti-gun rights activists continuously chant, “we don’t want to take your guns,” behind the scenes — in only a year — politicians have been working overtime to limit your right to bear arms.

Trump told his audience he wants to raise the ownership age. “It is something you have to think about,” Trump said. He added that “people don’t bring it up” because the NRA opposes the policy. Trump claimed that he would convince the NRA to go along with it.

As the Hill pointed out, he also said he supports confiscating guns from “mentally ill individuals,” (but who determines if someone is “mentally ill?.”

Trump said: “I like taking the guns early like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida … to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.

“Take the guns first, go through due process later.”

He also said mentally ill people shouldn’t have guns.

“A lot of people are saying ‘oh you shouldn’t be saying that’,” Trump said. “But I don’t want mentally ill people having guns.”

Again, I ask who determines of someone is “mentally ill”? Trump and the anti-gun folks? Yeah! That’s like Bill Gates determining if someone who rejects a vaccine is mentally competent to walk around free. What could go wrong with that?

Trump also said he wanted more “background checks and all of the data.”

Trump urged lawmakers to pass a comprehensive gun control bill.

Rebutting accusations that he is beholden to the NRA, Trump added that gun lovers have less power over him than lawmakers.

Earlier today, Dick’s Sporting Goods announced it would permanently ban sales of the AR-15 from its stores.

Republican Senators John Cornyn of Texas and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania have proposed legislation to fix holes in the background check system for gun buyers.

It’s getting harder and harder for a private man to own a gun. It’s what politicians want.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Trump Tells NRA, ‘The Left is Coming for Your Guns’ As He’s Been Quietly Taking Your Guns All Along

The Mask Hypocrisy

7/30/2020

I’ll say it straight out: Wearing masks is stupid, senseless, silly, sophomoric and downright servile. There’s not a doctor in the country who doesn’t know that masks are absolutely worthless when it comes to preventing the spread of a virus. And if your doctor is truly stupid enough to believe otherwise, you need to find another doctor—FAST.

There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long-residence-time aerosol particles (< 2.5 μm), which are too fine to be blocked, and the minimum-infective dose is smaller than one aerosol particle – and this has been known for decades.

The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009)

N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.

Cowling, B. et al. (2010)

None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein.

bin-Reza et al. (2012)

“There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”

Smith, J.D. et al. (2016)

“We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”

Offeddu, V. et al. (2017)

“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant.”

Long, Y. et al. (2020)

“A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

Conclusion Regarding That Masks Do Not Work

No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions.

Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public.

Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit.

Masks and respirators do not work.

A friend sent me this statistic to help put this so-called pandemic in perspective:

In Flathead County, Montana, where we live, the population is 106,134. The total number of “active cases” (translated: anyone who has tested positive for corona, whether they actually have it or not) is 213. Two people are said to have died from corona.

213 out of 106,134 is .002007.

My friend writes, “So that children can understand this, it means that 99.8 percent of all Flathead County residents are UNAFFECTED by this virus.”

Yet, as with the rest of the country, people all over town are walking around with those stupid masks on. The “home of the brave” is GONE. The spirit of fear has enveloped the entire country. And Christians are among the most fearful of all.

You and I both know that this is a willful, deliberate, purposeful effort by the Powers That Be to scare the American people into accepting tyranny over their lives without thinking—and it’s working.

I have said it before and I’ll say it again: I am personally convinced that this hellish plan could not have succeeded had Donald Trump not been in the White House. The plan was totally dependent upon Trump being in the White House. Had a Democrat been president, Christians and conservatives would have resisted. But when Donald Trump told America to limit crowds to less than ten, to shut down their businesses and churches and to not go anywhere without wearing a mask, Christians and conservatives folded like a bad poker hand. Their beloved master had spoken.

Trump willingly subjected the entire country to Bill Gates’ and Anthony Fauci’s voodoo science.

Let’s face some hard truth: People such as Gates and Fauci are evil, wicked monsters. They have absolutely no conscience about the millions of American livelihoods and lives they are destroying, the hundreds of thousands of people they are killing around the world, the fear and terror they are inflicting in the hearts of millions of people, the numbers of senior citizens who are dying alone and isolated from their loved ones, the numbers of people who are not receiving the medical care they need as hospitals and doctors hunker down and wait for a non-existent tsunami of corona cases, or the trillions of dollars of debt this phony pandemic has cost.

And politicians of both parties, who are full of greed and unbridled personal ambition, are seizing the opportunity that this “pandemic” provides to bring millions of dollars into their own election campaigns and increase the size and scope of the power that they are able to wield against an ignorant and frightened citizenry.

The one bright spot is the way hundreds of sheriffs across the country have risen up against these tyrannical lockdowns, shutdowns and mask orders.

Sheriff Jimmy Thornton from Sampson County [North Carolina] stated in a Facebook post:

“As Sheriff, it is my sworn duty to enforce laws enacted by our legislature, as well as protect the rights of all citizens.

It is my belief that Governor Cooper’s executive order mandating face coverings by all citizens in public is not only unlawful, but unenforceable. My deputies will NOT enforce an executive order that I feel violates the liberties of citizens.”

Here in Montana, 38 of our 55 sheriffs signed a statement informing the people of this State that a governor’s mask order is not enforceable by law and that they would not use their office to enforce such an order. Sheriffs all over the country are also taking principled stands for Liberty and constitutional government. Good for them. These sheriffs are showing more courage and acumen than the vast majority of America’s pastors.

From a spiritual perspective, any Christian who cannot see that these lockdowns, shutdowns and mask orders are nothing more than the tyrannical tools of an antichrist beastly system intent on destroying Liberty in this country is unworthy of the name Christian.

Those masks are the first step in a sequence of brandings for the human chattel that Gates and Company see us as. Forced vaccinations, universal contact tracing, implanted data chips, real-time mass surveillance, a global digital financial system, Artificial Intelligence, forced quarantines, computer-manipulated population reduction, ad infinitum, are coming next.

Bill Gates has a long and sordid history of vaccine corruption in poor countries around the world. And for those who think Donald Trump is some kind of superhero for defunding WHO, one should know that all Trump did was transfer our taxpayer dollars from WHO to the Bill Gates Vaccine Alliance (GAVI).

What we are now witnessing is the Mask of the Beast. And the fact that most Christians seem blind to its reality means the times of great “falling away” (II Thessalonians 2:3) and “strong delusion” (II Thessalonians 2:11) are also descending upon us.

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on The Mask Hypocrisy

Hospitals Profiting From COVID By Inflating Reported Cases

States Pay Hospitals To Inflate COVID Reports

When it comes to overinflated coronavirus death counts, we recently outlined how a fatal motorcycle accident in Florida was added to the state’s COVID-19 death toll. Still, no precise data shows just how overinflated death counts are on a state by state level. 

We have to rely on real journalism, such as a new report via CBS12 West Palm, that made a shocking discovery about deaths being incorrectly attributed to the virus. 

CBS12 said a 60-year old man who died from a gunshot blast to the head was labeled as a virus death. A 90-year old man who fell and died from a hip fracture was another. Even a 77-year old woman who died of Parkinson’s disease was somehow labeled a virus-related death. 

 
 

CBS12’s I-Team investigated these statistical anomalies by combing through the Medical Examiner’s spreadsheet of all people who recently died of the virus in Palm Beach County. 

What they found are “eight cases in which a person was counted as a COVID death, but did not have COVID listed as a contributing cause of death.” 

For more color on how a COVID-19 death is determined, it must be an immediate or underlying cause of death. So a gunshot to the head, a falling accident, and or Parkinson’s disease certainly doesn’t fit the defined criteria of classifying these deaths as virus-related.

Residents in South Florida are furious about the overinflated death toll: 

“I think it is completely misleading,” said Rachel Eade, a Palm Beach County resident who has been researching the same issue.

“We need to remove those cases that are not COVID exclusive, and we need to be giving people that information,” said Eade, who is one of the plaintiffs suing Palm Beach County for its mask mandate.

Eade told the I-Team she’s been digging around in medical reports and said, out of the 581 deaths, only 169 deaths are listed as COVID-19 without any contributing factors.

https://youtu.be/zhMMNUghNw4

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently told Fox News that his staff has been informed about virus deaths being incorrectly reported. 

DeSantis said, “I think the public, when they see the fatality figures, they want to know who died because they caught COVID.” 

“If you’re just in a car accident – and we have had other instances where there is no real relationship, and it’s been counted, we want to look at that and see how pervasive that issue is as well.”

Palm Beach County Medical Examiner’s office and Operations Manager Paul Petrino told the I-Team the eight cases were, in fact, errors. He said his medical staff was in the process of relabeling those deaths. 

Readers may recall, we pointed out last week how virus deaths could be overinflated, here’s  Dr. Scott Jensen on Fox News in April providing more color on the situation.

https://youtu.be/_qWmiWf81zI

If virus-related deaths are being overinflated in Florida, is the same being done in other states? 

(Coronavirus has been around for many years and can be detected everywhere. Most people likely have detectable antibodies from past exposure, but they are not sick or infectous – so the numbers can be inflated by merely increasing the numbers of people being tested. The more testing, the more cases. It means nothing!)

______________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Hospitals Profiting From COVID By Inflating Reported Cases

Why take a COVID test if it doesn’t work, and why wear a mask if it can make you sick?

7/23/2020

Suppose one of the most intense “safety practices”—wearing a mask—actually inflates the number of COVID diagnoses?

Suppose PCR and antibody tests turn out false positive results because people are wearing masks every day?

Is that possible?

Actually, it’s quite simple.  A person wearing a mask is breathing in his own germs all day long.  He breathes them out, as he should, but then he breathes them back in.

It seems evident that this unnatural process would increase the number and variety of germs circulating and replicating in his body; even creating active infection.

Along with this, a decrease in oxygen intake, which occurs when a mask is worn, would allow certain germs to multiply in the body—germs which would otherwise be routinely wiped out or diminished in the presence of an oxygen-rich environment.

Here’s the key: Both the PCR and antibody tests are known for registering false-positive results, since they cross-react with germs which have nothing to do with the reason for the test.

If wearing a mask increases the number and variety of germs replicating in the body, and also increases the chance of developing an active infection…then the likelihood of a false-positive PCR or antibody test is increased.

In other words, masks would promote the number of so-called COVID cases.  This would, of course, have alarming consequences.

People labeled “COVID” face all sorts of negative consequences.  I don’t have to spell them out.

In past articles, I’ve shown that both PCR and antibody tests DO register false-positives because they react with irrelevant germs.

For example, let’s consider the PCR:  From the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans”:

“Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”

Translation: Some PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVID—including plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold. The coronavirus has been around for a long time and is everywhere. That’s why more testing produces more positive results to report. Millions of people have the virus or antibodies from it but are not sick or infectous. It is a false test and the experts know it.

From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit”:

“…non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.”

Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses or antibodies in his system. What is the test proving, then? Nothing.

Now let’s consider the antibody test—

Business Insider, April 3, 202: “Some tests have demonstrated false positives, detecting antibodies to much more common coronaviruses.”

Science News, March 27: “Science News spoke with…Charles Cairns, dean of the Drexel University College of Medicine, about how antibody tests work and what are some of the challenges of developing the tests.”

“Cairns: ‘The big question is: Does a positive response for the antibodies mean that person is actively infected, or that they have been infected in the past? The tests need to be accurate, and avoid both false positives and false negatives. That’s the challenge’.”

That’s just a sprinkling of sources on both the PCR and antibody tests—revealing that both of these tests are worthless.  Many of those false-positives are the result of cross reactions with irrelevant germs.

And as I stated at the top of this article, if wearing masks increases the number and variety of germs circulating and replicating in the body, then it’s quite likely that masks will, in fact, contribute to false diagnoses of COVID.

Now, we come to a different angle on this story.  Everyone is aware that governors and other politicians are ramping up orders to wear masks to new insane levels. 

And what about their financial incentives?

It turns out that the states (and hospitals) are receiving federal money for EVERY COVID case.

“HHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act…”

“Below is a breakdown of how much funding per COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid. Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The New York Times for its analysis.”

“Alabama
$158,000 per COVID-19 case

Alaska
$306,000

Arizona
$23,000

Arkansas
$285,000

California
$145,000

Colorado
$58,000

Connecticut
$38,000

Delaware
$127,000…”

The article goes on to list every state and the money it will receive for EACH DIAGNOSED COVID CASE.

If mask wearing increases the likelihood of a COVID diagnosis, then: those states forcing new widespread mask dictates will be multiplying their federal $$$. Do the states and hospitals want MORE covid cases? Of course they do!

And if you really want to cover the bases, every method of fake case-counting will have the same ballooning $$$ effect for the states and hospitals.

ALL the so-called containment measures—masks, quarantine, isolation, distancing, lockdowns, economic destruction—bring on fear, stress, loneliness…lowering immune-system function…leading to more infections…which means more germs replicating in the body…which means more false-positive COVID diagnostic tests…and more human destruction…and more $$$ for the states and hospitals.

__________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Why take a COVID test if it doesn’t work, and why wear a mask if it can make you sick?

Caesar Act: Protecting or Destroying Syrian ‘Civilians’?

SYR002342

(When the US Government thinks nothing about shutting down America, why would we expect it to care about Syrian families? Trump and his government are Zionists who obey Netanyahu’s demands to push against President Assad because he won’t bow down to Israel.)

7/22/2020 – Salman Rafi Sheikh

The so-called US “Civilian Protection Act” does everything except “protect” the people of Syria. If anything, it aims to further destroy and strangulate the Syrian economy to make the country’s post-war economic reconstruction and development even more difficult. As the act’s “statement of policy” states in explicit terms, the US continues to seek a “regime change” in Syria. Indeed, the cardinal US purpose behind igniting a “civil war” in Syria was always to “send Assad home,” but the combined military strategy of Syria, Iran and Russia turned out to be the key to defeating the CIA–sponsored militant groups (ISIS/ISIL, Al-Qaeda, al-Nusra, etc). The US, as it stands, continues to pursue the same objective, although its military defeat in Syria has forced it to shift its focus from direct military intervention and support for militant groups to economic sanctions. Trump and Pompeo intend to punish the Syrian people, hopefully forcing them to rebel against Assad.

While this is not the first-time that sanctions have been imposed on Syria, the fact that this “protection act” expands the US reach to even non-Syrians i.e., Syrian’s “foreign friends” (Russia, China, Iran) makes it an even worst attack on Syrian economy. This is in turn part of an officially declared US strategy to make Syria a “quagmire for Russia.”

The aim is two-fold: to restrict the ability of Syria’s foreign friends to trade with Syria, and to exacerbate even further the already extremely poor conditions. With famine already knocking on the doors of Syria, fresh US sanctions will only deteriorate the economic conditions, which have already forced about 83 percent of Syrians to live below the poverty line.

The Syrian pound, which held steady at around 500 to the US dollar for several years, went into free fall last year, hitting a low of 3,000 in June, in anticipation of fresh sanctions. That currency drop is hindering Assad’s plans for collecting this year’s wheat to make up for a shortfall in imports that is drawing down on strategic reserves.

What, according to the UN itself, Syria needs is “immediate and substantial injection of funds, life-saving provisions of food, water, health care.” But the West gives it extensive sanctions and, what Mike Pompeo called, continued US “stabilisation activities in northeast Syria” where most of Syria’s oil wells are located. Whereas the oil could prove crucial for Syria’s economic recovery, this is obviously not what the US wants to see happening in Syria. Accordingly, an “oil disaster” under the US auspices is already looming large in northeast Syria.

At the same time, where the US is warning of an imminent crisis, the “Protection Act” aims to make sure that the Syrians get nothing. The act says the US president will impose sanctions on a “foreign person” if they undertake actions that include knowingly “selling or providing significant goods, services, technology, information or other support that significantly facilitates the maintenance or expansion of the Government of Syria’s domestic production of natural gas, petroleum or petroleum products.”

The act goes on to further explain that part of this US “strategy” is to “deter foreign persons from entering into contracts related to reconstruction in the areas” under the direct control of the Syrian government or its supporters from Russia and Iran. The self-explaining act makes it clear that it is a deliberate attempt to ensure that Syria, devastated by a war that the US and its allies engineered and imposed in 2011, is not rebuilt, and that Syrians have to live amid ruin.

This, the US hopes, may force the Syrians to rise up against their government eroding its legitimacy. But it is highly unlikely to produce the desired results; for, as it stands, sanctions without a clear policy objective are nothing more than making a political point at the expense of the most vulnerable i.e., common people of Syria. Therefore, if the underlying reasons for the Syrian people’s poor conditions are US sanctions, as even the Red Crescent said in its recent report, the Syrian people are unlikely to mobilise against the government, which has been resilient enough to bring political stability to a large part of Syria that was being damaged by the US and Israel.

That this is unlikely to happen is indeed one principal reason why the US has decided to impose sanctions on Syria to mainly wrest Assad’s, and Syria’s allies’, ability to stabilise the country. Therefore, while the US sanctions have never worked to bring, as in case of Iran and Venezuela, “regime change”, they are most likely to create a humanitarian crisis and make reconstruction efforts difficult. The so-called “protection act” is, therefore, is mainly anti-people and anti-development. It aims to spread chaos and erode political and economic stability efforts of the government.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Caesar Act: Protecting or Destroying Syrian ‘Civilians’?

How the State Destroys Families

JJuly 21, 2020

The peculiar consequences that result from government intervention are similar in all areas of economic and social life. Problems such as indifference, evaporating solidarity, irresponsibility, and short-term thinking are more than often caused or exacerbated by government interventions. This holds true for interventions in the financial world and in business, and it is no different with family policy. To make this clear, we first want to make a few comments about the economics of the family and then explain how state intervention tends to destroy families from within.

A Godly Power Plant

According to the Christian definition, the family is a community between a man and a woman and children, before God, with God, and for God. It is a kind of worship. Worship is what bonds the Christian family.

From this covenant of life before God, with God, and for God, a whole series of further consequences follow with logical necessity, e.g., the formal and public alliance of the spouses, lifelong loyalty, openness to many children, rejection of abortion, and Christian witness. Conversely, where there is no reference to God, there is no logical connection between these elements. They then appear as more or less arbitrary conventions. They become optional in the free design of individual lifestyles. Godly principles become superfluous and even considered hindrances.

In a society that loses the love for God, the family also loses its solid form. The Christian family is then gradually replaced by a patchwork of other forms of society, which are set up according to one’s taste. This is inevitable and cannot be prevented.

But the traditional dominance of the Christian family is not only threatened by widespread apostasy, it is also, and massively, under siege by state idolatry. The institution of the state is the greatest idolatry man has invented. It replaces both the family (as a nuclear unit) as well as God Himself in the fact that state actually becomes god.

An important precondition of this little miracle called “family” is that men and women are different, and they happily complement each other. They complement each other in their intellectual and physical abilities, in their social skills, in their spiritual and aesthetic sensibilities, and in their mental lives. It is therefore possible for them to grow together in all these dimensions beyond what would be possible for them alone and on their own.

From a purely economic perspective, families are probably the most efficient form of human organization. Unfortunately, this is hardly ever properly appreciated, not even by the economists. This is probably due to the fact that the family’s performance has many dimensions, most of which are difficult or impossible to measure, in distinct contrast to the performance of a company or of a sports club.

Families are exceptionally efficient, but if there is a lack of faith in the gifts of God, then failure is likely.

But how is this failure promoted by government intervention?

The State and the Family

To answer this question, we first have to consider the nature of the state. According to Max Weber’s well-known definition, the state is a monopoly of legitimate violence. This concept of the state is rooted in the legal concept of the modern state—the state that determines the law at its own discretion. It emerged in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries from the debates on the natural law conception of objective law, which is beyond human arbitrariness. The modern state claims to have special rights that correspond to its special obligations. Rather, it is above the law in a strict sense. The state is completely free to ignore God and decide for itself what is right and wrong.

Once this concept of the law and of the state has gained a foothold, there is a natural tendency toward unlimited state growth. There is no logical brake on this movement, because the powers and tasks of the state are no longer fundamentally limited, but fundamentally open and unlimited. And there is no economic brake on state growth, because as it grows, so does the income and power of state servants and all other interested parties.

Family policy has been compromised in the process of ​​state growth in recent years. In the past, various state interventions served to protect the family (tax privileges, child benefits, etc.), but today’s politics are almost exclusively harmful to the family.

Explicit political harm to families by the state is common. Notables like Friedrich Engels correctly recognized the family as a source of bourgeois morality and therefore condemned them. The state today considers itself as the legitimate owner and parent for all children, replacing the birth parents.

Tacit damage to the family is an important variant. In fact, the family-damaging effects of the state is sometimes not even considered. Monetary policy is an important example. Our current monetary system is designed to create constant price inflation, which in turn creates irresistible incentives for debt, and destruction by it. The risks are obvious. How many families have been broken because they proved to be unable to handle the debt burden? Monetary politicians have no intention of acknowledging this. And yet these are consequences that result from their decisions.

When the state intervenes it damages family life. Indeed, on the one hand, such interventions burden families financially, and, on the other hand, they make families superfluous. State usurps the God-ordained family structure. One important example is emancipation policy in the name of feminism. The state-funded all-day schools and all-day kindergartens expressly aim to alleviate the natural and healthy roll of the female. All of this fits seamlessly into feminist politics since the 1970s: abortion rights, divorce laws, custody laws, the deliberate demeaning of the role of mother, etc.

It is clear that this policy does not support the Christian family. In fact, it damages the family by worsening the relationship between the costs and benefits of family life. It reduces the incentives to start a family and keep it alive even under resistance. All-day schools and all-day kindergartens are financed through family taxation, so the returns to family life decrease while the need for additional monetary income increases. There are increased divorces and increased numbers of single parents who cannot pass family values to their children. This connection is further reinforced by the fact that the incentives for men to start a family also decrease. For one thing, you have to expect a higher probability of failure from the start. On the other hand, divorce law very often means economic ruin for men.

If you wanted to reduce families, you couldn’t think of anything better.

________________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on How the State Destroys Families

Did Psychopath Rockefeller Create the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918?

Unsanitary Military Barracks Hospital For Fake 1918 “Spanish Flu”

“The Truth About The 1918 ‘Viral Influenza’ Pandemic”

Dr. Gary G. Kohls, MD –

(Neither the so-called Spanish Flu of 1918, nor Smallpox in the 1800s, were cured by vaccines. Vaccines have never stopped epidemics or cured diseases.)

It Started with the Rockefeller Institute’s Crude Bacterial Meningitis Vaccination Experiment on US Troops. The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine experiment may have killed 50-100 million people.

“During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas.  The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.”

“During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.”

“The Rockefeller Institute and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine, contrary to the accepted mythology may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-1919.”

“The crude anti-bacterial vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.”

“According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 Pandemic autopsies reviewed.”

“Clean water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.”

“In 1918, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers…with disastrous results—but today, the vaccine industry experiments on infants. The vaccine schedule has never been tested.  The results of the experiment are: 1 in 7 of America’s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education, and over 50% have some form of chronic illness.” The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated 50-100 million people during the so-called pandemic 1918-19.”

What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true? What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin?

Newly analyzed documents reveal that the so-called “Spanish Flu” was a military vaccine experiment gone awry.

Summary
The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer.

More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.

The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not an influenza virus.

The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to military bases, the first one in Fort Riley, Kansas.

From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.

During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.

One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)

The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime.  Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old, and immunocompromised.

When WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.

During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.

During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers.

Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.

I have a personal connection to the Spanish Flu.  Among those killed by disease in 1918-19 are members of both of my parents’ families.

On my father’s side, his grandmother Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918. Sadie was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy.  Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also joined the Navy.  She died from “the infection” in 1919.

On my mother’s side, two of her father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family members who died lived in New York City.

I suspect many American families, and many families worldwide, were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious “Spanish Flu.”

In 1918, “influenza” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin.  It didn’t carry the specific meaning it does today.

It meant some mystery disease which dropped out of the sky.  In fact, “influenza” is from the Medieval Latin “influential” – an astrological term meaning a visitation under the influence of the stars. Or from Old French meaning “emanation from the stars that acts upon one’s character and destiny.”

Why is What Happened 100 Years Ago Important Now?

I will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society which occurred in NY during 1900-1920 and their impact on mortality from infectious diseases.

1.      Clean Water and Sanitation
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built an extraordinary system to bring clean water to the city from the Catskills, a system still in use today.  New York City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat waste, which protects the drinking water. The World Health Organization acknowledges the importance of clean water and sanitation in combating infectious diseases. (2)

2.    Electricity
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was available in every home.  Electricity allows for refrigeration. Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health benefit. When food is refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected from potential infectious diseases.  Cheap renewable energy is important for many reasons, including combating infectious diseases.

3.   Rockefeller’s Pharmaceutical Industry
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University).  The Institute is where the modern pharmaceutical industry was born. The Institute pioneered many of the approaches the pharmaceutical industry uses today, including the preparation of vaccine serums, for better or worse.  The vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.

US Mortality Rates data from the turn of the 20th century to 1965 clearly indicates that clean water, flushing toilets, effective sewer systems and refrigerated foods all combined to effectively reduce mortality from infectious diseases.

Have doctors and the pharmaceutical manufacturers taken credit for reducing mortality from infectious disease which rightfully belongs to sandhogs, plumbers, electricians, and engineers?
If hubris at the Rockefeller Institute in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which killed millions of people, what lessons can we learn and apply to today?

The Disease Was Not Spanish

While watching an episode of American Experience on PBS a few months ago, I was surprised to hear that the first cases of “Spanish Flu” occurred at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1918.  I thought, how is it possible this historically important event could be so badly misnamed 100 years ago and never corrected?

Why “Spanish”? Spain was one of a few countries not involved in World War I.  Most of the countries involved in the war censored their press.

Free from censorship concerns, the earliest press reports of people dying from disease in large numbers came first from Spain.  The warring countries did not want to additionally frighten the troops of the public, so they were content to scapegoat Spain. Soldiers on all sides would be asked to cross no man’s land into machine gun fire, which was frightening enough without knowing that the trenches were a disease breeding ground.

One hundred years later, it’s long past time to drop “Spanish” from all discussion of this pandemic.  The flu started at a United States military base in Kansas, so the disease could and should be more aptly named.

In order to prevent future disasters, the US (and the rest of the world) must take a hard look at what really caused the pandemic. The experimental vaccine was devised when the only vaccine that had ever shown any promise in preventing disease was the smallpox vaccine (which, when evaluated in retrospect, didn’t actually deserve credit for the disappearance of smallpox, since only a very small minority of world citizens ever actually received the vaccine.)

It is possible that one of the reasons the Spanish Flu has never been corrected is that it helps disguise the origin of the pandemic.

If the origin of the pandemic involved a vaccine experiment on US soldiers, then the US may prefer calling it Spanish Flu, instead of “The Fort Riley Bacteria of 1918,” or something similar.  The Spanish Flu started at the location this experimental bacterial vaccine was given making it the prime suspect as the source of the bacterial infections which killed so many.

It would be much more difficult to maintain the marketing mantra of “vaccines save lives” if a vaccine experiment that originated in the United States caused the deaths of 50-100 million people.

“The American Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19” is not an effective sales slogan. The overly simplistic ‘vaccines save lives’ is much better sounding.” – Kevin Barry

The Disease Which Killed so Many was not Flu nor was it a Virus.  It was Bacterial.
During the mid-2000’s there was much talk about “pandemic preparedness.”  Influenza vaccine manufacturers in the United States received billions of dollars to develop vaccines to make sure that we don’t have another lethal pandemic “flu,” like the one in 1918-19.

Capitalizing on the fake “Spanish Flu” helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion-dollar checks from governments, even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer.

It is not merely my opinion. Bacterial pneumonia was the real killer – thousands of autopsies confirm this fact.

According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed.  It is likely higher than 92.7%.

The researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies.

“… In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples. “There were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded nonhemolytic streptococci alone. There were NO negative lung culture (virus) results.” (3)

Pneumococci or streptococci were found in “164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples” autopsied.  That is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer.

Where Did the Spanish Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918-19 Originate?

When the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft.

Pre-war in 1917, the US Army was 286,000 men. During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas.  The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.

A Report on Anti-meningitis Vaccination and Observations on Agglutinins in the Blood of Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates, MD in 1918 (probably an ancestor of Bill Gates).

Between January 21st and June 4th of 1918, Dr. Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers were given 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine.  Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spit-balling dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses.

The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses.

4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11%), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%).

A total of 1,090 men were not there for the 3rd dose.  What happened to these soldiers? Were they shipped East by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe?  Were they in the Fort Riley hospital? Were they dead? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t tell us.

An article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might be.  Gates began his experiments in January 1918.

By March of that year, “100 men a day” were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley.  Are some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates’ report?

“… Shortly before breakfast on Monday, March 11, the first domino would fall signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza.

“Company cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “bad cold.” “Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints.

“By noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady…” (5)

Gates does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms: coughs, vomiting and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine. These symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks, traveling on trains to the Atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, and living and fighting in trenches.

The unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread.

From Dr. Gates’ report:
“Several cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted. This symptom had not been encountered before. Careful inquiry in individual cases often elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of vaccination were suffering from mild coryza (common head cold), bronchitis, etc., at the time of injection.

“Sometimes the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night.

“Next in frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general “aches and pains” in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few injections were followed by diarrhea.

“The reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for diagnosis.” (4)

According to Gates, they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers. Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which “simulated” meningitis, but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn’t really actual meningitis.

The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms.  Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic flu-like symptoms. (6)

Perhaps the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia are similar to symptoms of flu and that is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting.

How did the “Spanish Flu” Spread so Widely and so Quickly?

There is an element of a perfect storm in how the Gates bacteria spread.  WWI ended only 10 months after the first injections. Unfortunately for the 50-100 million who died, those soldiers injected with horse-infused bacteria moved a lot during those 10 months.

An article from 2008 on the CDC’s website describes how sick WWI soldiers could pass along the bacteria to others by becoming “cloud adults.”

“Finally, for brief periods and to varying degrees, affected hosts became “cloud adults” who increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria (not virus), particularly pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus.

“For several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as hospital wards, military camps, troop ships, and mines (and trenches)—some persons were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from various infections.

“Persons with active infections were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)

Three times in his report on the Fort Riley vaccine experiment, Dr. Gates states that some soldiers had a “severe reaction” indicating “an unusual individual susceptibility to the vaccine”.

While the vaccine made many sick, it only killed those who were susceptible to it.  Those who became sick and survived became “cloud adults” who spread the bacteria to others, which created more cloud adults, spreading to others where it killed the susceptible, repeating the cycle until there were no longer wartime unsanitary conditions, and there were no longer millions of soldiers to experiment on.

The toll on US troops was enormous and it is well documented.  Dr. Carol Byerly describes how the “influenza” traveled like wildfire through the US military.  (substitute “bacteria” for Dr. Byerly’s “influenza” or “virus”):

“… Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported “influenza outbreaks” in March, April, or May, and some of the infected troops carried “the virus” with them aboard ships to France …

“As soldiers in the trenches became sick, the military evacuated them from the front lines and replaced them with healthy men.

“This process continuously brought the bacteria into contact with new hosts—young, healthy soldiers in which it could adapt, reproduce, and become extremely virulent without danger of burning out.

“… Before any travel ban could be imposed, a contingent of replacement troops departed Camp Devens (outside of Boston) for Camp Upton, Long Island, the Army’s debarkation point for France, and took the bacteria with them.

“Medical officers at Upton said it arrived “abruptly” on September 13, 1918, with 38 hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and 193 the next.

“Hospital admissions peaked on October 4 with 483, and within 40 days, Camp Upton sent 6,131 men to the hospital for “influenza.” Some developed pneumonia so quickly that physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than listening to the lungs…” (7)

“The United States was not the only country in possession of the Rockefeller Institute’s experimental bacterial vaccine.

“A 1919 report from the Institute states: “Reference should be made that before the United States entered the war (in April 1917) the Institute had resumed the preparation of anti-meningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests of England, France, Belgium Italy and other countries.”

“The same report states: “In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for the curative serums worked out at the Institute, a special stable for horses was quickly erected …” (8)

An experimental anti-meningoccic serum made in horses and injected into soldiers who would be entering the cramped and unsanitary living conditions of war … what could possibly go wrong?

Is the bacterial serum made in horses at the Rockefeller Institute which was injected into US soldiers and distributed to numerous other countries responsible for the 50-100 million people killed by bacterial lung infections in 1918-19?

The Institute says it distributed the bacterial serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries during WWI. Not enough is known about how these countries experimented on their soldiers.

I hope independent researchers will take an honest look at these questions.

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

I believe standard medical hubris was responsible – doctors “playing God”, thinking they could tame nature without creating unanticipated problems.

With medical hubris, I do not think the situation has changed materially over the past 100 years.

What Now?

The vaccine industry is always looking for human test subjects.  They have the most success when they are able to find populations who are not in a position to refuse.

Soldiers (9), infants, the disabled, prisoners, those in developing nations – anyone not in a position to refuse.

Vaccine experimentation on vulnerable populations is an issue that is not just of the past.  In a video clip Dr. Stanley Plotkin describes using experimental vaccines on orphans, the mentally retarded, prisoners, and those under colonial rule.

The deposition was in January 2018. The hubris of the medical community is the same or worse now than it was 100 years ago.

Dr. Plotkin admits to writing:
“The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential.”

In the horrifying video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin he testifies under oath about the experiments that the pharmaceutical industry has done on unaware, uninformed  patients. (10)

In part because the global community is well aware of medical hubris and well aware of the poor record of medical ethics, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed international standards regarding the right to informed consent to preventative medical procedures like vaccination.

The international community is well aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes mistakes and is always on the lookout for human test subjects.  The Declaration states that individuals have the human right to consent to any preventative medical intervention like vaccination.

Human Dignity and Human Rights

1.      Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.
2.     The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.

Consent:
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. (11)

Clean water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.

Doctors and the vaccine industry have usurped credit which rightfully belongs to plumbers, electricians, sandhogs (underground construction workers), engineers and city planners.

For these reasons, policy makers at all levels of government should protect the human rights and individual liberties of individuals to opt out of vaccine programs via exemptions.

The hubris of the medical community will never go away. Policy makers need to know that vaccines like all medical interventions are not infallible.

Vaccines are not magic. We all have different susceptibility to disease.  Human beings are not one size fits all.

In 1918-19, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers with disastrous results.

Today, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given.  The results of the experiment are in: 1 in 7 of America’s \vaccinated children is in some form of special education, and over 50% have some form of chronic illness. (12)

Who exactly gave you that flu shot at Rite Aid? Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes wrong?

In 1918-19, there was no liability to the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines.

Today, there is no liability for vaccine manufacturers for injuries or death caused by vaccines, which was formalized in 1986. (13)

In 1918-19, there was no independent investigative follow up challenging the official story that “Spanish Flu” was some mystery illness which dropped from the sky.  I suspect that many of those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened, and that many of the doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened, but those people are long dead.

Today, the Pharmaceutical industry is the largest campaign donor to politicians and the largest advertiser in all forms of media, so not much has changed over 100 years.

This story will likely be ignored by mainstream media because their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising.

The next time you hear someone say “vaccines save lives” please remember that the true story of the cost/benefit of vaccines is much more complicated than their three-word slogan.  Also remember that vaccines have likely killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19.

——
Kevin Barry is the President of First Freedoms, Inc. a 501.c.3.  He is a former federal attorney, a rep at the UN HQ in New York and the author of Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC.

References
1. Deaths from Bacterial Pneumonia during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic
John F. Brundage*  and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article
2.  World Health Organization: Unsafe drinking water, sanitation and waste management
http://www.who.int/sustainable-development/cities/health-risks/water-sanitation/en/
3. J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 1; 198(7): 962–970.
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/
4. PDF of Fort Riley Study (1918)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf
5. American Experience, “The First Wave”, PBS
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza-first-wave/
6. Mayo Clinic:  Meningitis
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/meningitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350508
7. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91.
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/
8.  Rockefeller Institute pamphlet PDF (1919)
https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=rockefeller-institute-descriptive-pamphlet
9.  Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century, A Staff Report Prepared for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, United States Senate, December 1994
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835
10. Dr. Stanley Plotkin: vaccine experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and others (January 2018)
https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw
11.  Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (19 October 2005)
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
12. CDC Offers New Stats On Disability Prevalence
https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-prevalence/22034/
13. 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-vaccine-injury-act-protect/

_______________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Did Psychopath Rockefeller Create the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918?

Conclusive Proof — Masks Do Not Inhibit Viral Spread

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

Not a single randomized controlled trial with verified outcome has been able to detect a statistically significant advantage of wearing a mask versus not wearing a mask, when it comes to preventing infectious viral illness.

If there were any significant advantage to wearing a mask to reduce infection risk to either the wearer or others in the vicinity, then it would have been detected in at least one of these trials, yet there’s no sign of such a benefit.

There is no evidence that masks are of any utility for preventing infection by either stopping the aerosol particles from coming out, or from going in. You’re not helping the people around you by wearing a mask, and you’re not helping yourself avoid the disease by wearing a mask.

Infectious viral respiratory diseases primarily spread via very fine aerosol particles that are in suspension in the air. Viruses are too small to be filtered by a mask. Any mask that allows you to breathe therefore allows for transmission of aerosolized viruses.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Conclusive Proof — Masks Do Not Inhibit Viral Spread

Bill Gates Admits Corona Vaccination Will Produce 700,000 Victims

Gates wants to vaccinate the world
Tim Brown – July 15, 2020

In an interview with CNBC, Bill Gates said that he expects at least 700,000 victims (health damage and/or death) from a corona vaccination. No, seriously, he said it on live television.

In the interview, Gates says that for every 10,000 people, one permanent damage would occur from the vaccination, and he expects no less than 700,000 victims. (That’s more than the actual victims from COVID. Plus the real number of victims from the vaccine will be much higher than Gates predicts.)

Take a look.

Here are his words: “We have … you know … one in ten thousand … ah … side effects. That’s … you know … way more. Seven hundred thousand … ah … you know … people who will suffer from that. So, really understanding the safety at gigantic scale across all age ranges – you know – pregnant, male, female, undernourished and existing comorbidities. It’s very, very hard and that actual decision of ‚OK, let’s go and give this vaccine to the entire world… ah … governments will have to be involved because there will be some risk and indemnification (i.e., government protection against law suits) needed before that … ah … can be decided on.”

He expects 700,000 victims.  So we can expect even more victims. These numbers are much higher than the actual number of victims caused by the corona virus, whether dead by or with Corona or “other victims“.  He calls death or permanent disability – “side effects“.

 

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Bill Gates Admits Corona Vaccination Will Produce 700,000 Victims

Corona – The Simple Truth in Under 6 Minutes

Click on the picture.

________________________________________________________________________________

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Corona – The Simple Truth in Under 6 Minutes